Prediction of Jason Jung vs Dimitar Kutrovsky Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Jung vs D. Kutrovsky

Jason Jung

TPE

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

856

C. Rank

Ret.

114

Best Rank

293

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$350.6K

Career Money

$980

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Dimitar Kutrovsky

BUL

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

856

C. Rank

Ret.

114

Best Rank

293

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$350.6K

Career Money

$980

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Jung 3 - 1 Kutrovsky

They have played 10 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 6 and Dimitar Kutrovsky winning 4. The last match between Dimitar Kutrovsky and Jason Jung was at the Busan Challenger, 05-05-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Dimitar Kutrovsky getting the victory 7-5 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jung	3
Kutrovsky	1

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R1) Busan Challenger(05-05-15)

Stats

Dimitar Kutrovsky

Jason Jung

(R1) Dallas Challenger(02-03-15)

Stats

Jason Jung

Dimitar Kutrovsky

(Q1) U.S. National Indoor Tennis Championships - Memphis(02-08-14)

Stats

Jason Jung

Dimitar Kutrovsky

J. Jung vs D. Kutrovsky H2H Profile

J. Jung	Stats	D. Kutrovsky
$350,585	Career Prize Money	$980
55.35% (414-334)	Career Total W/L	61.84% (222-137)
1	Hard	1
2	Indoor	0
8	Titles	2
3	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Jung vs D. Kutrovsky Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jason Jung has won 46.12% of points on their second serve, while Dimitar Kutrovsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jason Jung, in recent form, has won 48.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dimitar Kutrovsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.54% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jason Jung has saved 52.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dimitar Kutrovsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jason Jung has won 22.22% of matches played (W/L 2/7), with Dimitar Kutrovsky winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26). Dimitar Kutrovsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 40/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 37/30).
Player level: In the last year, Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7), where as Dimitar Kutrovsky has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Jason Jung winning 3 times and Dimitar Kutrovsky being victorious 1 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 6 and Dimitar Kutrovsky winning 4.
The last match between Jason Jung and Dimitar Kutrovsky was at the Busan Challenger, 05-05-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Dimitar Kutrovsky getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:27.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jason Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.78 while Dimitar Kutrovsky has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jason Jung has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dimitar Kutrovsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dimitar Kutrovsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jason Jung vs Dimitar Kutrovsky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Jung vs D. Kutrovsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Jung	Stats	D. Kutrovsky
3	H2H Matches Won	1
6	Sets Won	4
50	Games Won	41
31	Aces (Total)	8
7	Total Double Faults	8
1:9:27	Average Match Time	1:9:27
69% (182/263)	1st Serve %	55% (105/190)
70% (127/182)	1st Serve Win %	70% (74/105)
36% (29/81)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (44/85)
53% (9/17)	Break Pts Won %	29% (8/28)
38% (72/190)	Return Points Win %	41% (107/263)
75% (3/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	25% (1/4)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	33% (1/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	67% (2/3)
67% (2/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber	W	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 James McCabeJ. McCabe	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

D. Kutrovsky Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Charlottesville Challenger - 02-11-2015
SF Tommy PaulT. Paul	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Tim SmyczekT. Smyczek	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Ernesto EscobedoE. Escobedo	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Adrien BosselA. Bossel	W	6-1 4-6 6-3	Stats
Fairfield Challenger - 12-10-2015
Q3 Peter PolanskyP. Polansky	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Jung vs D. Kutrovsky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Jung	Stats	D. Kutrovsky
55.35% (414/334)	YTD Win/Loss	61.84% (222/137)
54.67% (949/787)	Sets Win/Loss	60.02% (503/335)
51.99% (8605/7946)	Games Win/Loss	54.35% (4276/3591)
58.00% (308/223)	Hard Win/Loss	63.24% (129/75)
49.21% (31/32)	Clay Win/Loss	55.22% (37/30)
50.93% (55/53)	Indoor Hard W/L	64.38% (47/26)
43.48% (20/26)	Grass Win/Loss	60.00% (9/6)
0.24	Aces Per Game	0.07
1949	Aces Total	279
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.09
1621	Total Double Faults	363
1:12:48	Average Match Time	1st Match
566.24	Average Opponent Rank	606.03
63% (25533/40298)	1st Serve %	59% (4300/7289)
68% (17485/25533)	1st Serve Win %	70% (3008/4300)
51% (7548/14765)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (1531/2989)
40% (1594/3943)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (304/729)
39% (16005/40933)	Return Points Win %	40% (2936/7413)
38.89% (14/22)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
18.18% (2/9)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
40.00% (2/3)	Cups W/L	60.00% (6/4)
46.25% (37/43)	Main Tour W/L	54.55% (6/5)
53.93% (240/205)	Challenger W/L	61.60% (77/48)
69.59% (119/52)	Futures W/L	62.74% (133/79)
57% (409/720)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (216/349)
9% (2/22)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (4/8)
51% (122/241)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	54% (53/98)
52% (113/218)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (55/109)
85% (416/352)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (221/190)
15% (416/64)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (221/30)
18% (331/61)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (138/31)